THE TOWNLAND OF MULLAGHBANE (MULLAGHBRACK PARISH)
The townland of Mullaghbane is in the parish of Mullaghbrack in Armagh County.
It is labelled number 36 on the map. (There is another Mullaghbane in the parish
of Kildarton.) H952448. It is the townland of Hamiltonsbawn settlement.
Paterson (Armachiana, Vol. 16, p.24) notes:
Mullaghbane. Mullach signifies the top or summit, and as a root word it forms
the beginning of upwards of 400 names. Ban denotes white or whittish. Both
words are common in the county in various combinations.
The Environment and Heritage Service Sites and Monuments Record (2002) notes the following in this townland:
-
Rath of the Early Christian Period.
SMR NO: ARM 013:026
Grid Ref: H94834480
Townland: MULLAGHBANE, Hamilton’s Bawn
Condition: traces only
Vestigial traces of this site survive on a slight local eminence. It comprises a roughly circular platform c.28m in diameter. Only on the W side can traces of an original scarp be seem. The platform has a fairly flat top which is now used as a playground with swings etc.
PRONI records: OS/6/2/13/1 (Surveyed 1834-35. Engraved 1835.); OS/6/2/13/2
(Surveyed 1834-35. Revised 1860. Engraved 1863 (Stat file copy).); OS/6/2/13/3
(Surveyed 1834-35. Revised 1905-06. Published 1930.); OS/6/2/13/4 (Surveyed
1905-06. Revised 1954-55. Levelled 1888 and 1892 and 1902, 1905-1906. Levels
part revised 1948. Published 1958. (2 copies).); OS/6/2/12/1 (Surveyed 1835.
Engraved 1835.); OS/6/2/12/2 (Surveyed 1835. Revised 1860. Engraved 1860 (Stat
file copy).); OS/6/2/12/3 (Not Received.); OS/6/2/12/4 (Surveyed 1835. Revised
1905-06. Reprinted 1931-1947. Published 1931 with mss markings in red and stamped
references 2566, 2567, 2573.); OS/6/2/12/5 (Surveyed 1906. Revised 1948. Levelled
1888 and 1906. Levels revised 1949. Published 1953. (2 copies) – 1 being reprint
1953, 56, 61).); OS/6/2/28/1 (Surveyed 1835. Engraved 1835.); OS/6/2/28/2 (Surveyed
1835. Engraved 1835. Revised 1862. Revisions engraved 1864 (2 copies).); OS/6/2/28/3
(Surveyed 1835. Revised 1906-7. Published 1909 (reprint 1930, 34).); OS/6/2/28/4
(Surveyed 1835. Revised 1906-7. Published 1909 (reprint 1930, 34). Reprints
1934-1958 (2 copies).); OS/6/2/28/5 (Surveyed 1835. Revised 1906-7. Published
1909 (reprint 1930, 34). Reprints 1930-1946 with stamped ref 2772, 2778 and
2779.); OS/6/2/28/6 (Surveyed 1906-7. Revised 1956. Levelled 1903-4 and 1906.
Published 1961.); OS/6/2/31/1 (Surveyed 1835. Engraved 1835.); OS/6/2/31/2 (Surveyed
1835. Engraved 1835. Revised 1862. Engraved 1863.); OS/6/2/31/3 (Surveyed 1835.
Revised 1907. Published 1909. Reprinted 1930.); OS/6/2/31/4 (Surveyed 1907.
Revised 1956-7. Levelled 1903-4 and 1906. Published 1961 (2 copies).); VAL/1B/213,
VAL/1B/230, VAL/1B/244A (1st valuation records.); VAL/12B/10/24A, VAL/12B/10/24B,
VAL/12B/10/24C, VAL/12B/10/24D, VAL/12B/10/25A, VAL/12B/10/25B, VAL/12B/10/25C,
VAL/12B/10/25D, VAL/12B/10/25E, VAL/12B/15/13A, VAL/12B/15/13B, VAL/12B/15/13C,
VAL/12B/15/13D, VAL/12B/15/21A (Valuation annual revision list.); VAL/2B/2/12A,
VAL/2B/2/28C, VAL/2B/2/35A, VAL/2B/2/35B (Griffith valuation list.).
I (AM, 2013) interpret the dotted circular figure in Bodley’s map as the site of a fort or defensive position important in 1609 and most probably the site of the early christian rath noted in the EHS records at grid reference H94834480.
